Kathmandu — Nepali Congress Chief Whip Shyam Ghimire has raised concerns over the Nepal judiciary’s increasing interference in parliamentary affairs. He specifically criticized the judiciary for intervening in the Appropriation Bill passed by the Parliament, calling it a challenge to legislative authority.
Judiciary’s Role and Concern Over Legislative Interference
Speaking at a Parliamentary Hearing Committee meeting at Singha Durbar on Monday, Ghimire emphasized that while interpreting the constitution and laws is the judiciary’s role, questioning laws passed by Parliament—especially financial bills—undermines democratic principles.
“There is no dispute over the judiciary’s role in interpreting the law and constitution. However, it is problematic when the judiciary begins scrutinizing Appropriation Bills passed by the legislature. This undermines the separation of powers,” he said.
Ghimire stressed that Nepal’s democracy depends on the balance between the legislature, executive, and judiciary. Recent trends show institutions overstepping their mandates and encroaching on others’ authority, which he described as worrying.
“When one institution crosses constitutional boundaries of another, it disrupts governance harmony. If unchecked, this leads to institutional friction,” he warned.
Concerns Over Judicial Delays and Political Implications
He also expressed dissatisfaction with delays in Nepal’s judicial system. Many cases remain pending in the Supreme Court for years, affecting timely justice and public trust. “Cases often stall in the Supreme Court for years. This delay leaves citizens frustrated and powerless,” he added.
Ghimire’s remarks have revived debate over the balance of power between Nepal’s legislative and judicial branches. Political reactions vary, indicating this issue may fuel further institutional discussions soon.
